<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetViper Interactive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com</link>
	<description>Web Design, SEO, PPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Penguin update.  Making Google Worse than Ever.</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-penguin-update-making-google-worse-than-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-penguin-update-making-google-worse-than-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has released a new update and this time its called Penguin. The days of Panda are over and SEO&#8217;s all over the world are very unhappy. Penguin seems to have gone too far making search results less relevant than &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-penguin-update-making-google-worse-than-ever/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has released a new update and this time its called Penguin.  The days of Panda are over and SEO&#8217;s all over the world are very unhappy.  Penguin seems to have gone too far making search results less relevant than ever.  Goolge says these updates are aimed at cleaning up the spammy results from the search engines.  </p>
<p>A quick search for the terms &#8220;pods&#8221; shows these results.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/nv4/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/pods-ranks.jpg" alt="" title="pods-ranks" width="623" height="649" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-736" /></p>
<p>So can it possible get more spammy than that.  A click on that link shows this website.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/nv4/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/jaxsmart.jpg" alt="" title="jaxsmart" width="816" height="546" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-737" /></p>
<p>How is this site possibly worth ranking #3 on a competitive term like pods.  </p>
<p>Obviously they are pulling in same local info from our location in Jacksonville, FL, but how can that site even rank after all of these Panda updates focusing on quality content and better links.  The answer, it didn&#8217;t.  That site did not show up until Penguin.</p>
<p>So from what I see, the Pengiun update is a failure.  It has placed junk sites ahead of relevant results &#8211; having the exact opposite effect of what they said it was supposed to do.</p>
<p>What can we do about it?  Nobody knows at this point.  All I know is there are over 500 complaints on Google&#8217;s own blog.</p>
<p>http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-step-to-reward-high-quality.html</p>
<p>I will keep you all posted as more developments with Penguin come out in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-penguin-update-making-google-worse-than-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penality for ‘Over-Optimized’ websites</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/penality-for-%e2%80%98over-optimized%e2%80%99-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/penality-for-%e2%80%98over-optimized%e2%80%99-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the SWSX event in America, Google’s Spam team member Matt Cutt’s announced about the new changes in Google search results coming in Weeks/months designed to penalize the Over – Optimized Sites. This announcements give shock to the techies &#038; &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/penality-for-%e2%80%98over-optimized%e2%80%99-websites/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the SWSX event in America, Google’s Spam team member Matt Cutt’s announced about the new changes in Google search results coming  in Weeks/months designed to penalize the Over – Optimized Sites. This announcements give shock to the techies &#038; SEO professional. After Spreading this news over the Web the response by the Matt cutt’s is:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;there is something we’ve been working on in the last few months, and hopefully in the next couple months or so, in the coming weeks, we hope to release it. And the idea is basically to try to level the playing ground a little bit.</p>
<p>So all those people who have sort have been doing, for lack of a better word, “over optimization,” or overly doing their SEO, compared to the people who are just making great content and trying to make a fantastic site, we want to sort of make that playing field a little more level.</p>
<p>And so that’s the sort of thing where we try make the GoogleBot smarter, we try to make our relevance more adaptive, so if people don’t do SEO, we handle that. And we also start to look at the people who sort of abuse it, whether they throw too many keywords on a page or whether they exchange way too many links, or whatever they’re doing to sort of go beyond what a normal person would expect in a particular area. And so that is something where we continue to pay attention, and we continue to work on it. And it is an active area where we’ve got several engineers on my team working on that right now.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>So Matt Cutts says that good white hat tactics used on websites are still fine.  Those that are doing blackhat tactics and doing too well will be penalized.  What does this actually mean, I guess we will all find out when this launches in the future.</p>
<p>We do not use any blackhat techniques so we do not expect any site that we have done to be negatively effected by this latest update.</p>
<p>Oh and the last thing they said &#8220;DON&#8217;T BUY LINKS&#8221;.</p>
<p>SOURCE:  <a href="http://wpmu.org/alert-google-announces-a-new-seo-over-optimization-penalty/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/wpmu.org/alert-google-announces-a-new-seo-over-optimization-penalty/?referer=');">WMPU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/penality-for-%e2%80%98over-optimized%e2%80%99-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Panda 3.4</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently used Twitter to officially announce the release of the latest update to its ranking algorithm, Panda 3.4. This update rolled out on March 24 andis targeting low-quality websites. The update was specifically a refresh to Panda 3.3, so &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-4/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google recently used Twitter to officially announce the release of the latest update to its ranking algorithm, Panda 3.4. This update rolled out on March 24 andis targeting low-quality websites. The update was specifically a refresh to Panda 3.3, so it seems no new signals or algorithm changes were made. What this means is that Panda 3.4 will have very little impact to the majority of websites. </p>
<p>Google confirmed via Twitter:</p>
<p>Panda refresh rolling out now. Only ~1.6% of queries noticeably affected.</p>
<p>While the 1.6% of websites that were hit will notice quite an impact, this is a very small effect to the overall traffic worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Panda 3.3</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google released Panda 3.3 update in February. Though 40 updates were done, we haven&#8217;t seen any change in ranks for the website we do SEO for. What stands out the most to me is: Link evaluation. We often use characteristics &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google released Panda 3.3 update in February.  Though 40 updates were done, we haven&#8217;t seen any change in ranks for the website we do SEO for.  </p>
<p>What stands out the most to me is:<br />
Link evaluation. We often use characteristics of links to help us figure out the topic of a linked page. We have changed the way in which we evaluate links; in particular, we are turning off a method of link analysis that we used for several years. We often rearchitect or turn off parts of our scoring in order to keep our system maintainable, clean and understandable.</p>
<p>We must continue to be careful with how solid our links are and always avoid spammy linking.</p>
<p>The complete list is below.</p>
<p><a href="http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/search-quality-highlights-40-changes.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/search-quality-highlights-40-changes.html?referer=');">http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/search-quality-highlights-40-changes.html</a></p>
<ul>
<li><b>More coverage for related searches.</b> [launch codename &#8220;Fuzhou&#8221;] This launch brings in a new data source to help generate the &#8220;Searches related to&#8221; section, increasing coverage significantly so the feature will appear for more queries. This section contains search queries that can help you refine what you&#8217;re searching for.</li>
<li><b>Tweak to categorizer for expanded sitelinks. </b>[launch codename &#8220;Snippy&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Megasitelinks&#8221;] This improvement adjusts a signal we use to try and identify duplicate snippets. We were applying a categorizer that wasn&#8217;t performing well for our expanded sitelinks, so we&#8217;ve stopped applying the categorizer in those cases. The result is more relevant sitelinks.</li>
<li><b>Less duplication in expanded sitelinks. </b>[launch codename &#8220;thanksgiving&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Megasitelinks&#8221;] We&#8217;ve adjusted signals to reduce duplication in the snippets for <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/evolution-of-sitelinks-expanded-and.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/evolution-of-sitelinks-expanded-and.html?referer=');">expanded sitelinks</a>. Now we generate relevant snippets based more on the page content and less on the query.</li>
<li><b>More consistent thumbnail sizes on results page.</b> We&#8217;ve adjusted the thumbnail size for most image content appearing on the results page, providing a more consistent experience across result types, and also across mobile and tablet. The new sizes apply to rich snippet results for recipes and applications, movie posters, shopping results, book results, news results and more.</li>
<li><b>More locally relevant predictions in YouTube.</b> [project codename &#8220;Suggest&#8221;] We&#8217;ve improved the ranking for predictions in YouTube to provide more locally relevant queries. For example, for the query [lady gaga in ] performed on the US version of YouTube, we might predict [lady gaga in times square], but for the same search performed on the Indian version of YouTube, we might predict [lady gaga in India].</li>
<li><b>More accurate detection of official pages.</b> [launch codename &#8220;WRE&#8221;] We&#8217;ve made an adjustment to how we detect official pages to make more accurate identifications. The result is that many pages that were previously misidentified as official will no longer be.</li>
<li><b>Refreshed per-URL country information.</b> [Launch codename &#8220;longdew&#8221;, project codename &#8220;country-id data refresh&#8221;] We updated the country associations for URLs to use more recent data.</li>
<li><b>Expand the size of our images index in Universal Search.</b>  [launch codename &#8220;terra&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Images Universal&#8221;] We launched a change to expand the corpus of results for which we show images in Universal Search. This is especially helpful to give more relevant images on a larger set of searches.</li>
<li><b>Minor tuning of autocomplete policy algorithms.</b> [project codename &#8220;Suggest&#8221;] We have a narrow set of <a href="http://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=106230" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en_amp_answer=106230&amp;referer=');">policies for autocomplete</a> for offensive and inappropriate terms. This improvement continues to refine the algorithms we use to implement these policies.</li>
<li><b>&#8220;Site:&#8221; query update</b> [launch codename &#8220;Semicolon&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Dice&#8221;] This change improves the ranking for queries using the &#8220;site:&#8221; operator by increasing the diversity of results.</li>
<li><b>Improved detection for SafeSearch in Image Search.</b> [launch codename "Michandro", project codename &#8220;SafeSearch&#8221;] This change improves our signals for detecting adult content in Image Search, aligning the signals more closely with the signals we use for our other search results.</li>
<li><b>Interval based history tracking for indexing.</b> [project codename &#8220;Intervals&#8221;] This improvement changes the signals we use in document tracking algorithms.&nbsp;</li>
<li><b>Improvements to foreign language synonyms.</b> [launch codename &#8220;floating context synonyms&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Synonyms&#8221;] This change applies an improvement we previously launched for English to all other languages. The net impact is that you&#8217;ll more often find relevant pages that include synonyms for your query terms.</li>
<li><b>Disabling two old fresh query classifiers.</b> [launch codename &#8220;Mango&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Freshness&#8221;] As search evolves and new signals and classifiers are applied to rank search results, sometimes old algorithms get outdated. This improvement disables two old classifiers related to query freshness.</li>
<li><b>More organized search results for Google Korea.</b> [launch codename &#8220;smoothieking&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Sokoban4&#8221;] This significant improvement to search in Korea better organizes the search results into sections for news, blogs and homepages.</li>
<li><b>Fresher images.</b> [launch codename &#8220;tumeric&#8221;] We&#8217;ve adjusted our signals for surfacing fresh images. Now we can more often surface fresh images when they appear on the web.</li>
<li><b>Update to the Google bar.</b> [project codename &#8220;Kennedy&#8221;] We continue to iterate in our efforts to deliver a beautifully simple experience across Google products, and as part of that this month we made further adjustments to the Google bar. The biggest change is that we&#8217;ve replaced the drop-down Google menu in the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/next-stage-in-our-redesign.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/next-stage-in-our-redesign.html?referer=');">November redesign</a> with a consistent and expanded set of links running across the top of the page.</li>
<li><b>Adding three new languages to classifier related to error pages. </b>[launch codename "PNI", project codename "Soft404"] We have signals designed to detect crypto 404 pages (also known as &#8220;soft 404s&#8221;), pages that return valid text to a browser but the text only contain error messages, such as &#8220;Page not found.&#8221; It&#8217;s rare that a user will be looking for such a page, so it&#8217;s important we be able to detect them. This change extends a particular classifier to Portuguese, Dutch and Italian.</li>
<li><b>Improvements to travel-related searches. </b>[launch codename &#8220;nesehorn&#8221;] We&#8217;ve made improvements to triggering for a variety of flight-related search queries. These changes improve the user experience for our <a href="http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/12/see-flight-results-right-on-googlecom.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/12/see-flight-results-right-on-googlecom.html?referer=');">Flight Search feature</a> with users getting more accurate flight results.</li>
<li><b>Data refresh for related searches signal.</b> [launch codename &#8220;Chicago&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Related Search&#8221;] One of the many signals we look at to generate the &#8220;Searches related to&#8221; section is the queries users type in succession. If users very often search for [apple] right after [banana], that&#8217;s a sign the two might be related. This update refreshes the model we use to generate these refinements, leading to more relevant queries to try.</li>
<li><b>International launch of shopping rich snippets. </b>[project codename &#8220;rich snippets&#8221;] <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/11/rich-snippets-for-shopping-sites.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/11/rich-snippets-for-shopping-sites.html?referer=');">Shopping rich snippets </a>help you more quickly identify which sites are likely to have the most relevant product for your needs, highlighting product prices, availability, ratings and review counts. This month we expanded shopping rich snippets globally (they were previously only available in the US, Japan and Germany).</li>
<li><b>Improvements to Korean spelling.</b> This launch improves spelling corrections when the user performs a Korean query in the wrong keyboard mode (also known as an &#8220;IME&#8221;, or input method editor). Specifically, this change helps users who mistakenly enter Hangul queries in Latin mode or vice-versa.</li>
<li><b>Improvements to freshness.</b> [launch codename &#8220;iotfreshweb&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Freshness&#8221;] We&#8217;ve applied new signals which help us surface fresh content in our results even more quickly than before.</li>
<li><b>Web History in 20 new countries.</b> With Web History, you can browse and search over your search history and webpages you&#8217;ve visited. You will also get personalized search results that are more relevant to you, based on what you&#8217;ve searched for and which sites you&#8217;ve visited in the past. In order to deliver more relevant and personalized search results, we&#8217;ve launched Web History in Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Morocco, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Estonia, Kuwait, Iraq, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Nigeria, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Bosnia and Herzegowina, Azerbaijan, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Moldova, and Ghana. Web History is turned on only for people who have a Google Account and previously enabled Web History.</li>
<li><b>Improved snippets for video channels. </b>Some search results are links to channels with many different videos, whether on mtv.com, Hulu or YouTube. We&#8217;ve had a feature for a while now that displays snippets for these results including direct links to the videos in the channel, and this improvement increases quality and expands coverage of these rich &#8220;decorated&#8221; snippets. We&#8217;ve also made some improvements to our backends used to generate the snippets.</li>
<li><b>Improvements to ranking for local search results.</b> [launch codename &#8220;Venice&#8221;] This improvement improves the triggering of Local Universal results by relying more on the ranking of our main search results as a signal.&nbsp;</li>
<li><b>Improvements to English spell correction.</b> [launch codename &#8220;Kamehameha&#8221;] This change improves spelling correction quality in English, especially for rare queries, by making one of our scoring functions more accurate.</li>
<li><b>Improvements to coverage of News Universal.</b> [launch codename &#8220;final destination&#8221;] We&#8217;ve fixed a bug that caused News Universal results not to appear in cases when our testing indicates they&#8217;d be very useful.</li>
<li><b>Consolidation of signals for spiking topics.</b> [launch codename &#8220;news deserving score&#8221;, project codename &#8220;Freshness&#8221;] We use a number of signals to detect when a new topic is spiking in popularity. This change consolidates some of the signals so we can rely on signals we can compute in realtime, rather than signals that need to be processed offline. This eliminates redundancy in our systems and helps to ensure we can continue to detect spiking topics as quickly as possible.</li>
<li><b>Better triggering for Turkish weather search feature.</b> [launch codename &#8220;hava&#8221;] We&#8217;ve tuned the signals we use to decide when to present Turkish users with the weather search feature. The result is that we&#8217;re able to provide our users with the weather forecast right on the results page with more frequency and accuracy.</li>
<li><b>Visual refresh to account settings page.</b> We completed  a visual refresh of the <a href="https://www.google.com/settings/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.google.com/settings/?referer=');">account settings page</a>, making the page more consistent with the rest of our constantly <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/evolving-google-design-and-experience.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/evolving-google-design-and-experience.html?referer=');">evolving design</a>.</li>
<li><b>Panda update. </b>This launch refreshes data in the Panda system, making it more accurate and more sensitive to recent changes on the web.</li>
<li><b>Link evaluation. </b>We often use characteristics of links to help us figure out the topic of a linked page. We have changed the way in which we evaluate links; in particular, we are turning off a method of link analysis that we used for several years. We often rearchitect or turn off parts of our scoring in order to keep our system maintainable, clean and understandable.</li>
<li><b>SafeSearch update.</b> We have updated how we deal with adult content, making it more accurate and robust. Now, irrelevant adult content is less likely to show up for many queries.</li>
<li><b>Spam update. </b>In the process of investigating some potential spam, we found and fixed some weaknesses in our spam protections.</li>
<li><b>Improved local results.</b> We launched a new system to find results from a user&#8217;s city more reliably. Now we&#8217;re better able to detect when both queries and documents are local to the user.</li>
</ul>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-panda-3-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google says SEO is not SPAM</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-says-seo-is-not-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-says-seo-is-not-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optmization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it’s official. Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s Web spam team, says that SEO (Search Engine Optimization) is not spam. This is not a big surprise to many of use that have been in the industry a lot time, &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-says-seo-is-not-spam/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BS75vhGO-kk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Well, it’s official. Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s Web spam team, says  that SEO (Search Engine Optimization) is not spam.  This is not a big surprise to many of use that have been in the industry a lot time, but it helps justify what we do to clients who are not really sure if SEO is the right thing to do.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that he is talking about White-hat techniques, quality links and quality content.  This is the strategy NetViper Interactive Inc uses to help rank your website at the top of the search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/google-says-seo-is-not-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WP-Admin goes blank</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/wp-admin-goes-blank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/wp-admin-goes-blank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This can be a serious problem and mean one of your plugins has caused a lot of problems with your site. It is a scary experience when you cannot log in to your own site. That being said, try this &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/wp-admin-goes-blank/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can be a serious problem and mean one of your plugins has caused a lot of problems with your site.  It is a scary experience when you cannot log in to your own site.  </p>
<p>That being said, try this first.</p>
<p>Look at your functions.php file and find any empty spaces at the top or bottom.  Remove those spaces and re-upload functions.php.  That may solve your problem and save you a TON of time and grey hair!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/wp-admin-goes-blank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disable WordPress Auto Formatting</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/disable-wordpress-auto-formatting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/disable-wordpress-auto-formatting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes WordPress can be extremely annoying with the Auto Formatting. Often it will add a or a where you don&#8217;t want one and it will totally mess up the look of your page. Do how do we fix this? There &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/disable-wordpress-auto-formatting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes WordPress can be extremely annoying with the Auto Formatting.  Often it will add a
<p> or a <br /> where you don&#8217;t want one and it will totally mess up the look of your page.  Do how do we fix this?</p>
<p>There are a couple of options.</p>
<p>1. You can get a plug-in to disable the auto formatting completely.  Such as this one. <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/ps-disable-auto-formatting/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/wordpress.org/extend/plugins/ps-disable-auto-formatting/?referer=');">PS Disable Auto Formatting</a>.  The downside to this plug in is that it kills the auto formatting fro your entire site, which might mess up a lot of page you have already finished with</p>
<p>2. Another option &#8212; and a better option &#8212; is to create a custom field that will allow you to disable the auto formatting only on the pages you want to disable it.</p>
<p>I learned this trick <a href="http://www.stampede-design.com/blog/2010/12/disable-html-auto-formatting-in-wordpress/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.stampede-design.com/blog/2010/12/disable-html-auto-formatting-in-wordpress/?referer=');">here</a></p>
<p>So in this method we edit our functions.php to include the following:</p>

<div class="wp_syntax"><table><tr><td class="line_numbers"><pre>1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
</pre></td><td class="code"><pre class="language" style="font-family:monospace;">function WP_auto_formatting($content) {
    global $post;
    if(get_post_meta($post-&gt;ID, 'disable_auto_formatting', true) == 1) {
        remove_filter('the_content', 'wpautop');
    }
    return $content;
}
add_filter( &quot;the_content&quot;, &quot;WP_auto_formatting&quot;, 1 );</pre></td></tr></table></div>

<p>Now we are able to set a custom field of &#8220;disable_auto_formatting&#8221; and give it a value of 1.  This will disable the auto formatting on that page only.  </p>
<p>Very sweet.  WP 3.21 compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/disable-wordpress-auto-formatting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Site launched</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/new-site-launched/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/new-site-launched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the newest version of NetViper Interactive.com. We have removed the Powerpoint services and LeadViper Craigslist program. We will launch a new site for that program on its own. Please send us your feedback for the new site design.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the newest version of NetViper Interactive.com.  We have removed the Powerpoint services and LeadViper Craigslist program.  We will launch a new site for that program on its own.  Please send us your feedback for the new site design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/new-site-launched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starting on Version 4.0 of the&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/starting-on-version-4-0-of-the/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/starting-on-version-4-0-of-the/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/starting-on-version-4-0-of-the/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starting on Version 4.0 of the website]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting on Version 4.0 of the website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/starting-on-version-4-0-of-the/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Removing &#8220;Allowed Tags&#8221; on the comment form.</title>
		<link>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/removing-allowed-tags-on-the-comment-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/removing-allowed-tags-on-the-comment-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>netviper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netviperinteractive.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This solution is from the wordpress forums from Emsi.  It is not guaranteed to work on all themes, but it did work fine for me on my theme based on twenty ten. Follows these steps: 1. back up your functions.php &#8230; <a href="http://www.netviperinteractive.com/removing-allowed-tags-on-the-comment-form/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This solution is from the wordpress forums from Emsi.  It is not guaranteed to work on all themes, but it did work fine for me on my theme based on twenty ten.</p>
<p>Follows these steps:</p>
<p>1. back up your functions.php file.</p>
<p>2. Add the following to your functions.php file<br />
function my_comment_form_args($user_identity, $post_id, $req) {<br />
	$args = array(<br />
		&#8216;comment_notes_after&#8217; =&gt; &#8221;<br />
	);<br />
	return $args;<br />
}<br />
3. then replace &lt;?php comment_form();?&gt; with &lt;?php comment_form( my_comment_form_args($user_identity, $post-&gt;ID, $req) ); ?&gt; in your comments.php file.  That should be the last line.</p>
<p>Thats it. </p>
<p>To see the full thread, visit <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic/solved-allowed-tags-in-comment-form" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/wordpress.org/support/topic/solved-allowed-tags-in-comment-form?referer=');">http://wordpress.org/support/topic/solved-allowed-tags-in-comment-form</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netviperinteractive.com/removing-allowed-tags-on-the-comment-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

